Fuente Magna og Pokotia-monolitten: Forskelle mellem versioner
Content deleted Content added
MGA73bot (diskussion | bidrag) m Retter fra <references/> til {{reflist}}; kosmetiske ændringer |
m robot Ændrer: en:Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact#Mediterranean Antiquity |
||
Linje 28: | Linje 28: | ||
[[Kategori:Kunsthistorie]] |
[[Kategori:Kunsthistorie]] |
||
[[en:Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact#Mediterranean Antiquity]] |
|||
[[en:Fuente Magna]] |
|||
[[es:Fuente Magna]] |
[[es:Fuente Magna]] |
||
[[it:Fuente Magna]] |
[[it:Fuente Magna]] |
Versionen fra 30. jan. 2010, 18:23
Denne artikels neutralitet er omstridt. (Lær hvordan og hvornår man kan fjerne denne skabelonbesked) |
Fuente Magna er en stenskål som blev fundet af en bonde i 1950'erne ved Tiahuanacu i sydamerika. Fra den gang og til ca. år 2000 er den blevet antaget for at være et svindelnummer. Fra år 2000 blev Fuente Magna antaget for at være autentisk af Clyde Winters. [1] [2] Autenciteten deles ikke af andre videnskabsfolk. Pokotia-monolitten blev fundet 4. januar 2002.
Inskriptionerne på Fuente Magna og den 2 meter høje Pokotia-monolit er blevet antaget at være eller forsøgt fortolket [2] [3] bl.a. som kileskrift, proto-elamite og proto-sumerisk af Clyde Winters. Kileskrift og semitisk hænger sammen med Mesopotamiske traditioner. Inskriptionerne er blevet tidsbestemt til ca. 3500 f.Kr. - 3000 f.Kr. (den Akkadiske, Sumeriske tidsperiode).
Spire Denne artikel om sydamerikansk geografi er en spire som bør udbygges. Du er velkommen til at hjælpe Wikipedia ved at udvide den. |
Se også
Eksterne henvisninger
- ^ World Mysteries - Strange Artifacts, Fuente Magna - Rosetta Stone of Americas Citat: "... The Fuente Magna has not been shown in Bolivia until year 2000. It was considered false, until we began the investigations...It contains two texts, one in cuneiform and another Semitic language of possible Sinaitic extraction cuneiform influences...Chronologically, this leads us to the 3500/3000 B.C., the Sumerian/Akkadian period...Monolith of Pokotia...the monolith from an early Tiahunaco`s period that nobody doubts is not a fake...Semitic and cuneiform writings in Tiahuanco - this has enormous significance...Chapter 3 - Decipherment...During Inca (Sumerian: En-ka "Great Lord") times..."
- ^ a b The Decipherment of the Fuente Magna Bowl By Clyde A. Winters, Ph.D.
- ^ The Decipherment of the Fuente Magna Bowl Citat: "...Dr. Winters believed that researchers had been unable to read the writing because they refused to compare Proto-Elamite and Proto-Sumerian writing with other writing systems used in 3000-2000 BC...Using the phonetic values of the Vai script, Dr. Winters has been able to decipher the Indus Valley and Linear A writing...By comparing the Fuente Magna scripts and symbols with the Vai writing, Winters found many matches. Then after referring to several published works on the Sumerian language and writing system, e.g., C.S. Ball, Chinese and Sumerian (London, 1913), and John A. Halloran, Sumerian Lexicon, ( http://www.sumerian.org/sumerlex.htm ), he was able to decipher the Fuente Magna writing..."
- Fuente Magna. Rosetta stone of the Americas Citat: "...It is clear that civilisation in ancient South America is much older and more extensive than has been previously recognised..."
- Ancient Archaeology - List of remarkable archaeological finds Citat: "...The possible relation between the Yonaguni/Okinawa writing, the Indian clay tablet, the finds at Peru, and the Phoenician end result leads to the conclusion that this is another piece of evidence pointing to a common cultural origin..."