Diskussion:Vor Frue Sogn (Aalborg Kommune)
Vor Frue Sogn in Aalborg was in Fleskum Herred, not Kær Herred. The map looks like it is in Kær Herred because the words are written out on the island. But look closely and you will see an arrow pointing from the word Frue into the center of the city of Aalborg in Fleskum Herred. (Skrev 1miss2mary3 (diskussion • bidrag) . Husk at signere dine indlæg.)
- After figuring out which map you were referring to I'll have to agree with you: The colouring of "sognene" for the two "herreder" is actually wrong. This may have caused the misunderstandings. Looking e.g. at this site, it is obvious, that Ålborg Vor Frue/Vor Frue Sogn (Aalborg Kommune belonged to Fleskum Herred. Let's see, what we can do about it. --Arne (Amjaabc) (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 08:21 (CEST)
- Another investigation suggests that Vor Frue Sogn possibly was split between the two "herreder" - take a look at Vesterkær Sogn. But there seems to be some confusion; take for example a look at this thread: [1].
- Basically, I think that although your change seems sensible, I suggest that your update is reverted. --Arne (Amjaabc) (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 08:36 (CEST)
- Fleskum herred is correct: another map shows it more clearly map2. -- Mvh. Vrenak (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 08:40 (CEST)
- I don't agree that this map proves the affiliation. On the contrary, the boundary between Kær and Fleskum (the dotted line in Limfjorden) clearly goes south of Egholm. --Arne (Amjaabc) (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 08:48 (CEST)
- The conclusion is based on the fallacy that the name is placed in the correct location and the arrow is to be ignored. Egholm does NOT belong to Frue sogn. I suggest looking at Krabsen (put in Vesterkær in the search). Mvh. Vrenak (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 08:56 (CEST)
- I don't agree that this map proves the affiliation. On the contrary, the boundary between Kær and Fleskum (the dotted line in Limfjorden) clearly goes south of Egholm. --Arne (Amjaabc) (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 08:48 (CEST)
- Fleskum herred is correct: another map shows it more clearly map2. -- Mvh. Vrenak (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 08:40 (CEST)
- As far as I can see, Egholm belonged to Aalborg Frue Landsogn, and if this is not affiliated with Vor Frue Sogn, then you both are right. Perhaps we should insert a "Not to be confused with" at the top? --Arne (Amjaabc) (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 09:04 (CEST)
- Putting in a disam is a good idea. -- Mvh. Vrenak (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 09:06 (CEST)
- As far as I can see, Egholm belonged to Aalborg Frue Landsogn, and if this is not affiliated with Vor Frue Sogn, then you both are right. Perhaps we should insert a "Not to be confused with" at the top? --Arne (Amjaabc) (diskussion) 4. jul 2017, 09:04 (CEST)