Diskussion:Det Kgl. Bibliotek

Theft

In the English Wikipedia's article about the Royal Library, it is first claimed that the family friend was found guilty of the theft, then later that he was acquitted. Is that correct? Also, it is stated that the case is being appealed. Has the appeal been decided? Thanks, --AxelBoldt

In June 2004 the widow, son and daughter in law of the thief was found guilty and so was the family friend from Ireland. The widow and the friend then appealed and in December 2004 the friend was acquitted (Source in Danish). In April 2005 the daughter of the theif was found guilty as well (Source in Danish).--Heelgrasper 18. maj 2005 kl. 05:19 (CEST)

Thanks a lot! Two minor questions: was the widow found guilty on appeal in Dec 2004? And in April 2005, are we talking about the appeal of the daughter in law, or is this a separate case, involving a true daughter? --AxelBoldt

The widow was still found guilty i December 2004. The case in April 2005 involved a true daughter. I don't know exactly why that case wasn't tried along with the others.--Heelgrasper 22. maj 2005 kl. 20:51 (CEST)

Kunsttyveriet

Bør artiklen ikke indeholde en passage om tyveriet af de 3200 bøger? F.eks. kunne det nævnes hvor mange der er genfundne og et par eksempler på vigtige bøger der stadig ikke er genfundet. Valentin 23. sep 2007, 12:05 (CEST)

en tilfældig navnelighed

Bogsamleren Niels Foss er muligvis ikke den samme som jazzmusikeren! Jeg vil anse det for usandsynligt.

Ifølge DBL drejer det sig åbenbart om en bogsamler der levede 1670-1751. Jeg har rettet linket. --Saddhiyama 3. mar 2010, 11:27 (CET)

POV

Jeg har nu sat {{POV}} på artiklen, så 80.167.156.184 (diskussion • bidrag • e-mail) kan uddybe sin kritik. --Palnatoke (diskussion) 19. dec 2012, 15:59 (CET)

Der var åbenbart ingen kritik at uddybe. Fjerner skabelonen igen. --Palnatoke (diskussion) 2. jan 2013, 16:52 (CET)

Og nu?

Hvad skal gøres efter fusionen med Statsbiblioteket? Den rigtige er klart at oprette en disambiguation page som peger på hhv "Det Kongelige Bibliotek" og "Det Kgl. Bibliotek", ikke?