Brugerdiskussion:Mikl194VF\Archive1

Machine translations

Hi. Please don't contribute machine translated material, it'll never be any good and the work involved clearing up surpasses the benefit of it. Regards Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 5. mar 2012, 00:07 (CET)

Jeg taler en lille dansk, så jeg prøver at retter, selv jeg ved det er ikke perfekt, især dårlig ... Men, som det er forståeligt, jeg tror det kunne går. Jeg tænker, det er bedre hvis det artikeler er fuldføre med fejler end ikke-eksisterende. Hjerteligt --Mikl194VF (diskussion) 5. mar 2012, 00:23 (CET)

Hey sorry to say this, but your Danish is very bad, and not very understandable. --Rasmusbyg (diskussion) 5. mar 2012, 00:26 (CET)

Det er alt for i aften? --Mikl194VF (diskussion) 5. mar 2012, 00:33 (CET)

I'll have to disagree with you in your views of articles with poor language. While some errors can be tolerated and fixed quite easily, entries, like the last ones on Tulle, will require a great deal of work to fix and it'll most likely be faster and easier to go to the original source and start over, translating it "by hand".

Fixing articles in this way is quite tedious work and resources are, in my view, better spent on other contributors creating new quality articles. Regards Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 5. mar 2012, 01:09 (CET)

By the way, please don't erase your discussion page here on dawiki. You can, though, move old discussions to an Brugerdiskussion:Mikl194VF\Archive1. Regards Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 5. mar 2012, 01:09 (CET)

I admit that the history part of the article about Tulle is full of errors, and I was reading it when I saw you had delete it. But the others parts are lists and event if it may be errors, it's possible to understand. So, I'll not publish other texts articles in danish (I let native-danish traduce, even if I'm sure in 10 years it will be the same) but the "articles of lists" can be understood and are pretty correct, so I will continue to publish them only. Regards --Mikl194VF (diskussion) 5. mar 2012, 01:23 (CET)

STOP med at oprette artikler ved hjælp af maskinoversættelse. Hvis du ikke kan skrive på dansk, er det bedre at lade være med at oprette artikler. --Pixi Uno (diskussion) 6. apr 2012, 23:27 (CEST)

Empty articles?

Hi. Are you going to insert some text in your latest articles about the french communes? Please finish one article before creating a new one. Regards Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 24. mar 2012, 23:36 (CET)

Be happy, there are no mistakes ... --Mikl194VF (diskussion) 24. mar 2012, 23:40 (CET)

Well, I don't think that anybody douts the content you inserted but we dislike articles with only infoboxes - so I have to repeat Knud: If you don't add any real text to the articles, we would rather have you not creating the articles and wait for somebody who will write both text and infobox. --Arne (Amjaabc) (diskussion) 25. mar 2012, 10:31 (CEST)

Do you seen the articles about french towns ? There are only an infobox and a short sentence. If you just want that, like "Brive-la-Gaillarde er en stor fransk provinsby. Den er beliggende i departementet Corrèze.", it's also possible but I don't think it's really useful. It's not better for the big city, you can see Toulouse. Regards. --Mikl194VF (diskussion) 25. mar 2012, 11:04 (CEST)