Brugerdiskussion:Dim Grits
I really ask you not to change maps on artickles about russian oblasts! You can change maps on ukrainian wikipedia. mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 15. jan 2016, 01:17 (CET)
- Are You Jimbo? Wikipedia don't need non neutral editors. Say No politicize encyclopedia. I really ask you.--Dim Grits (diskussion) 15. jan 2016, 22:05 (CET)
- @Dim Grits: We are showing the de facto situation on the maps on danish wikipedia. That is not poiliticising. Thats just the situation since 28 February 2014. No matter what Ukraine wants, and no matter what UN and others means, the da wikipedia choose to describe the de facto situation. We have in the question of Krim described the de jure and de facto situation, as it is. But when we show a map of Russia, we show the de facto map. If you want us to change policy in this matter you will have to discuss it on Wikipedia:Landsbybrønden, this is the place for the broad and interdisciplinary discussions. Untill a new policy is agreed upon, you will have to accept, that your change of maps will be undone. mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 16. jan 2016, 03:04 (CET)
- Well, I agree with Bruger:PerV that this is the de facto situation. Besides that, the situation is unlikely to change. But Danish W. should probably present the borders of Russia according to UN, if the map was supposed to show the borders of Russia. But the map is not showing that, the map is showing the division of Russia in oblasts, a division which is the is done by the Russian authorities. Danish authorities should respect the Russian authority to define subdivisions of their country. Also Danish Wikipedia should not be part of conflict regarding the collapse of Ukraine. Further discussion in Danish, as this is the Danish language Wikipedia.--Madglad (diskussion) 16. jan 2016, 04:17 (CET)
- I agree with Dim Grits. Since the occupation of Krim is not internationally accepted, and not by Denmark, wikipedia can not take part in favor of one country (in this case Russia). This is not Russian wikipedia. And this kind of change should not take part without a previous discussion on wikipedias debate site. Rmir2 (diskussion) 16. jan 2016, 09:27 (CET)
- Your are politacan! Your are not good wikipedians. Why are you use this map in Rabat-Salé-Zemmour-Zaēr, or this in Hokkaido? What are your respect? Power? Yes, power you'r respect! Japan & Morocco don't have power - don't have Danish Wikipedia respect. Ask danish wiki-people in village pump about that, we want hear them.--Dim Grits (diskussion) 17. jan 2016, 22:18 (CET)
- Well, I agree with Bruger:PerV that this is the de facto situation. Besides that, the situation is unlikely to change. But Danish W. should probably present the borders of Russia according to UN, if the map was supposed to show the borders of Russia. But the map is not showing that, the map is showing the division of Russia in oblasts, a division which is the is done by the Russian authorities. Danish authorities should respect the Russian authority to define subdivisions of their country. Also Danish Wikipedia should not be part of conflict regarding the collapse of Ukraine. Further discussion in Danish, as this is the Danish language Wikipedia.--Madglad (diskussion) 16. jan 2016, 04:17 (CET)
- @Dim Grits: We are showing the de facto situation on the maps on danish wikipedia. That is not poiliticising. Thats just the situation since 28 February 2014. No matter what Ukraine wants, and no matter what UN and others means, the da wikipedia choose to describe the de facto situation. We have in the question of Krim described the de jure and de facto situation, as it is. But when we show a map of Russia, we show the de facto map. If you want us to change policy in this matter you will have to discuss it on Wikipedia:Landsbybrønden, this is the place for the broad and interdisciplinary discussions. Untill a new policy is agreed upon, you will have to accept, that your change of maps will be undone. mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 16. jan 2016, 03:04 (CET)
Ongoing discussion, stop changing map[rediger kildetekst]
Hej Dim Grits. Stop venligst! Hvis du fortsætter med at vandlisere sider, som du gjorde på siden Omsk oblast, vil du blive blokeret fra at redigere på Wikipedia. På forhånd tak, mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 17. jan 2016, 22:44 (CET)
There is an ongoing discussion here, untill that discussion are concluded it's look at as vandalism to change the map. It might be your view get support, then all maps will be changed. As it is now in the discussion two support your view, while the majority are against. So please don't change the maps on any artickles, before the democratic forum have concluded.
If you change any maps again, I will have to ask an administrator to take necessary actions against you. That would mean you will be blocked from da wiki. Best regards mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 17. jan 2016, 22:44 (CET)
- To Dim Grits: I have suggested a vote on this issue now, so we can get rid of this pro-russian disinformation once and for all. It will take some days, then all will be clear. After that hopefully it will all be reverted. Best regards Rmir2 (diskussion) 18. jan 2016, 09:01 (CET)