Brugerdiskussion:פארוק

Thank you for participating in this community project, פארוק. ( dansk)

We would like to give you the opportunity to be free and productive. Here are a few directions that might help you:

A collection of useful links in English can be found on the English help pages.
Please use our Sandbox (sandkasse) for experimenting.
Feel free to add your expertise to Wikipedians by interest.
Please create your user page in order to provide information about who you are, where you're from, and in which languages you communicate; you may use the template {{iwuser}}.
If you want to make a careful start editing in Danish, try to expand some of our stubs (påbegyndte artikler).
Questions for help can be asked at the Helpdesk.
To sign messages, use four tildes: ~~~~
More information (in Danish) can be found on our policy pages and the wikiquette page.

If you have any questions regarding this edition of Wikipedia, please visit our embassy.

Kind regards, Trade (diskussion) 4. jun 2012, 23:05 (CEST)

Hi. Please don't contribute with machine translations. Regards Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 8. aug 2015, 22:40 (CEST)

I repeat the former request. I have now looked at two of your "artickles" if we can call it that. They were a random collection of words, which gave no meening in Danish. And even, the artickles you deliver is not only stubs, they are even substubs. Meaning too short for danish wikipedia. If the artickles wont be expanded and translated into danish, they will be deleeted on sight. Best wishes mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 8. sep 2015, 00:06 (CEST)

To reiterate: Stop with the machine translations. They'll never be any good and you're annoying the locals... Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) ~

On the subject Mt. Scopus

@Bruger:פארוק: If you cant even read danish or write in english you should stop contributing to da wiki. At least I cant understand a word of this.

Dont you know that Mt. Scopus was lying in what was desinged to be "a corpus seperatum" or on en wiki: Corpus separatum also called "a speciel international regime", neither a part of Israel nor Palestine? You can even look at the map from wikipedia beside these lines, there its clearly shown, that Mt. Scopus lies inside East Jerusalem.

I didnt write that Israel "stole" the hill, just they occupied it opposit to the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine from 1947, which was decide the 29 November 1947 with support from 72% of the voting countries. If you would read a little bit about Deir Yassin or other atrocities in Palestine you would be a little bit more interesting to talk with. If I become your enemy by telling true history, so be it.

Best wishes mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 8. sep 2015, 01:35 (CEST)

Not a battleground

Hi. Wikipedia is not a battleground or a soap box, so tone down the political rethorics. Regards Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 8. sep 2015, 09:19 (CEST)

I remind you about the above tip. Keep it cool, please. Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 10. sep 2015, 11:05 (CEST)

Machine translations

Dear פארוק. As mentioned before you are kindly asked not to create articles using poor machine translations solely to push other users to translate them from machine Danish to Danish for you. City of David is the latest example, which I believe to be showing absolute lack of respect of every Wikipedia's wish to create high-quality articles. This time you have not even bothered to create an article with a Danish title, which after so many times could be considered as an act of vandalism, ultimately punishable by blocking. So please do not do that. You are of course welcome to contribute in other ways, i.e. updating pictures &c. --Masz 25. dec 2016, 18:51 (CET)