Brugerdiskussion:Madyas
 | Thank you for participating in this community project, Madyas. ( dansk)We would like to give you the opportunity to be free and productive. Here are a few directions that might help you:
If you have any questions regarding this edition of Wikipedia, please visit our embassy. Kind regards, Cgtdk (diskussion) 21. feb 2015, 18:31 (CET) |
Hi. Can you provide some more details about what is going on with the dispute over Sarmater? Thanks. --Cgtdk (diskussion) 21. feb 2015, 18:31 (CET)
Please cease your disruptive POV pushing. I have removed your recent edit to Sarmater, please do not revert it. If you wish to have a reasonable discussion about the article, preferably in Danish, then you are welcome to start a discussion on the talk page. --Cgt (diskussion) 27. feb 2015, 18:25 (CET)
- Hi. There informations is sourced. Therefore I think no problem. Madyas (diskussion) 27. feb 2015, 18:43 (CET)
- There are also sources that say the world is flat. The problem is that your view appears to be a minority opinion among scholars. As you apparently do not speak Danish, your involvement in the Danish Wikipedia concerns me; it looks like you're only interested in pushing your POV, not in the Danish Wikipedia. I am not an expert in this field, but all the sources I've found say that they're an Iranian people, and engaging in edit wars across many wikis (and being blocked on the English Wikipedia) doesn't make me more likely to believe you. --Cgt (diskussion) 27. feb 2015, 19:00 (CET)
- No, just the opposite. General opinion about Sarmatians were Turkic people. And scientific datas are proves that Sarmatians were Turkic; Sarmatians were nomadic, equestrian and archer people. Sarmatians from Turkic country Central Asia. Sarmatians were Turkic-speaking people and they were warrior people. Sarmatians used kurgans. Kurgans were in Turkic culture. etc. Videlicet they did not like the Iranians. Madyas (diskussion) 27. feb 2015, 20:51 (CET)
- Madyas, if the majority view among scholars is that the Sarmatians were a Turkic people, then why does it say that they're an Iranian people everywhere I look? It's difficult for me to verify your references and their credibility, but while investigating this issue, I've only found sources (reliable ones, like Encyclopædia Britannica) that say that they're Iranian. Why is that? Also, please refrain from editing the article until this matter is settled. --Cgt (diskussion) 28. feb 2015, 11:10 (CET)
- If you just search the internet, say that they're an Iranian people. Sarmatians have concrete sources that Turkic (Kurgans etc.). Is there a concrete source that İranian? Madyas (diskussion) 28. feb 2015, 11:57 (CET)
- Well, there's the Encyclopædia Britannica, the Encyclopedia of European Peoples, and many other sources. I am not an expert in this field, and I am not qualified to judge some obscure paper. However, it is quite clear that your view does not represent the majority opinion, and as an encylopedia Wikipedia should reflect the majority view. That you edit articles on wikis for languages which you do not even speak to promote your, seemingly minority, POV, makes me, and others, suspicious of your motivations. I would suggest that you start a discussion about this topic on the English Wikipedia, once your block for disruptive editing expires, and resolve the issue there instead of editing on wikis where you do not speak the language. Do not continue to unilaterally edit the Danish article on Sarmatians to assert that they were Turkic, it is unproductive and your edits will be reverted. If you wish to discuss this issue further, please leave a message at the embassy. --Cgt (diskussion) 28. feb 2015, 13:02 (CET)
- If you just search the internet, say that they're an Iranian people. Sarmatians have concrete sources that Turkic (Kurgans etc.). Is there a concrete source that İranian? Madyas (diskussion) 28. feb 2015, 11:57 (CET)
- Madyas, if the majority view among scholars is that the Sarmatians were a Turkic people, then why does it say that they're an Iranian people everywhere I look? It's difficult for me to verify your references and their credibility, but while investigating this issue, I've only found sources (reliable ones, like Encyclopædia Britannica) that say that they're Iranian. Why is that? Also, please refrain from editing the article until this matter is settled. --Cgt (diskussion) 28. feb 2015, 11:10 (CET)
- No, just the opposite. General opinion about Sarmatians were Turkic people. And scientific datas are proves that Sarmatians were Turkic; Sarmatians were nomadic, equestrian and archer people. Sarmatians from Turkic country Central Asia. Sarmatians were Turkic-speaking people and they were warrior people. Sarmatians used kurgans. Kurgans were in Turkic culture. etc. Videlicet they did not like the Iranians. Madyas (diskussion) 27. feb 2015, 20:51 (CET)
- There are also sources that say the world is flat. The problem is that your view appears to be a minority opinion among scholars. As you apparently do not speak Danish, your involvement in the Danish Wikipedia concerns me; it looks like you're only interested in pushing your POV, not in the Danish Wikipedia. I am not an expert in this field, but all the sources I've found say that they're an Iranian people, and engaging in edit wars across many wikis (and being blocked on the English Wikipedia) doesn't make me more likely to believe you. --Cgt (diskussion) 27. feb 2015, 19:00 (CET)