Wikipedia:Sletningsforslag/Involvement teorien

Fra Wikipedia, den frie encyklopædi

Involvement teorien er en markedsføringsteori. Bruger:Prebenbonde har oprettet, og der er ikke sket meget ved den siden. Der er ingen kilder i artiklen, og jeg har fjernet et link til en død side. De er næsten ingen hits når amn søger specifikt på det danske ebgreb, mens "Involvement theory" giver nogle flere hits - dog ingen til andre wikier. Toxophilus (diskussion) 20. okt 2020, 14:39 (CEST)

Aha. Begrebet "consumer involvement theory" er brugt i en bachelor-opgave i USA for 30 år siden. Enwiki har ingen artikel om emnet. Nu kan vi så overveje om dawiki skal lave førstehåndsforskning om emnet? Nej. --Madglad (diskussion) 25. okt 2020, 11:25 (CET)
 Kommentar der er andre mulige fund.
Bemærk; det kunne være et kandidatspeciale (i starten står der at hun (nu) har en Ph.D.): en:Thesis Citat: "....A thesis or dissertation [1] is a document submitted in support of candidature for an academic degree or professional qualification presenting the author's research and findings.[2] In some contexts, the word "thesis" or a cognate is used for part of a bachelor's or master's course, while "dissertation" is normally applied to a doctorate, while in other contexts, the reverse is true.[3]..." --Glenn (diskussion) 25. okt 2020, 15:45 (CET)
 Kommentar - Kilde: Park, C., & Mittal, B. (1983). Involvement theory and consumer behavior. In G. Zaltman, & M. Wallendorf (Eds.), Consumer behavior: Basic findings and management implications (pp. 549±569). New York: Wiley.
Fundet i: February 2000. Journal of Economic Psychology 21(5):545-576. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00018-0. SourceRePEc. Aron O'Cass Griffith University, School of Marketing and Management, PMB 50 Gold Coast Mail Centre, Gold Coast, Qld 9726, Australia. An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing Citat: "...Keywords: Consumer involvement; Product involvement; Purchase decision involvement; Advertising involvement; Consumption involvement...It should be noted that the consumer involvement theory (consumer involvement profile) proposed is a micro-theory of how different involvements exist and operate within consumers. Its contribution is to provide a richer explanation of how involvement operates and forms the link between consumers and objects..." --Glenn (diskussion) 25. okt 2020, 15:45 (CET)
 Kommentar Vigtigt: acrwebsite.org: James A. Muncy and Shelby D. Hunt (1984) ,"Consumer Involvement: Definitional Issues and Research Directions", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11, eds. Thomas C. Kinnear, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 193-196 Citat: "...Though involvement has recently become a central issue to consumer researchers, substantial confusion exist as to its nature...The concept "involvement" has been discussed for about two decades in the consumer behavior literature (see Krugman 1965) and even longer in psychology (see Sherif and Cantril 1947). Interest in involvement has heightened in recent years by those studying the consumer decision process. Kassarjian (1978) has accused consumer researchers of anthropomorphism when they infer that buyers are always as involved in the purchasing process as they themselves are...Upon reviewing the involvement literature, the reason for such confusion becomes clear. The term "involvement" has been used by researchers to denote at least five distinct (yet perhaps related) concepts...The purpose of the present paper is two-fold. First, it separates and discusses the various concepts which have been labeled "involvement." The purpose here is not to provide an exhaustive literature review of involvement. Only those papers which best typify each concept are discussed. The purpose is to explain the fundamental nature of each...CONCLUSION...The present paper reviewed five major types of involvement which have been discussed in the literature. They were all identified as conceptually distinct constructs, with separate (yet perhaps related) domains. Each concept has its own unique potential for future research..." --Glenn (diskussion) 25. okt 2020, 16:05 (CET)
 Kommentar Anvendt søgning til sidste fund: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22involvement+theory%22+%22social+psychology%22 --Glenn (diskussion) 25. okt 2020, 16:09 (CET)
 Kommentar John L. Lastovicka and David M. Gardner (1978) ,"Low Involvement Versus High Involvement Cognitive Structures", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 05, eds. Kent Hunt, Ann Abor, MI : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 87-92
Fundet via søgning via flere fraser fra Involvement teorien: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22involvement+theory%22+%22High+involvement%22+%22Low+involvement%22 --Glenn (diskussion) 25. okt 2020, 16:18 (CET)
Ja, så er der fundet en del kilder hvor ordene fremgår indgår.
Når der nu tilsyneladende ikke nogen på dawiki, der har kendskab til det samlede begreb, og kan skrive en artikel uden at det bliver førstehåndsforskningslignende, skulle du måske skrive et passende sted på enwiki og foreslå at de opretter en artikel for emnet. De må have et sted a la WP:EA. Hvis det er et vigtigt begreb indenfor markedsføringsteori, er det underligt at enwiki ingen artikel har.
Må jeg i øvrigt høfligst minde om at huske på at redigere ad én omgang. Selv om du er autopatruljeret kommer dine redigeringer jo til at fylde et halvt skærmbillede hos folk, der har sletningsforslaget på deres overvågningsliste. --Madglad (diskussion) 25. okt 2020, 17:10 (CET)
Konklusion:
Konsensus om sletning. -Pugilist (diskussion) 4. nov 2020, 22:53 (CET)