Wikipedia:Sletningsforslag/Skabelon:ArchINFORM
Skabelonen Skabelon:ArchINFORM viderestiller til et eksternt site, der er en ren kopi af den engelske Wikipedia. Den ser jeg ingen grund til at have. Mvh KnudW (diskussion) 16. feb 2018, 09:08 (CET)
- Slet - KnudW (diskussion) 16. feb 2018, 09:08 (CET)
Behold - Den er ikke anderledes end de andre, eksterne henvisninger.• Rodejong 💬 ✉️ ☑ 🖖 16. feb 2018, 11:06 (CET)- Kommentar - @Fadesga:, you made this template in 2013, but it isn't used at any pages. Did you have any plans with it? --Kjeldjoh (diskussion) 16. feb 2018, 12:31 (CET)
- @Kjeldjoh: just started using this template, please take a look at Arne Jacobsen, Flemming Lassen and Frank Lloyd Wright. Regards, --Fadesga (diskussion) 16. feb 2018, 15:41 (CET)
- But why redirect to a site that's only a mirror of the english Wikipedia? We have interwiki for that. I fail to see the reasoning behind it. Is Archinform a credible and relevant site? Regards KnudW (diskussion) 16. feb 2018, 16:17 (CET)
- The fundamental database of this website (especially regarding the most important architects from the 20th century) has been run by the University of Karlsruhe. --Fadesga (diskussion) 17. feb 2018, 00:10 (CET)
- But why redirect to a site that's only a mirror of the english Wikipedia? We have interwiki for that. I fail to see the reasoning behind it. Is Archinform a credible and relevant site? Regards KnudW (diskussion) 16. feb 2018, 16:17 (CET)
- Slet - I agree with KnudW the template/skabelon don't ad anything to the artickles. mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 16. feb 2018, 16:22 (CET)
- Slet - ved nærmere undersøgelser må jeg være enige i at den kan slettes. • Rodejong 💬 ✉️ ☑ 🖖 16. feb 2018, 19:08 (CET)
- Slet Formålsløs. --Madglad (diskussion) 19. feb 2018, 21:41 (CET)
- Slet - What? Hvad skal man med den? Toxophilus (diskussion) 2. mar 2018, 07:20 (CET)
- Slet - er enig med jer andre i at den bør slettes ----Zoizit (diskussion) 15. mar 2018, 09:59 (CET)
- Slet - This template has been used in 17 articles since it has been suggested deleted. In all 17 cases, is the ArchINFORM article a copy-paste from the English Wiki. I don't think this is an improved contribution to the Danish Wiki.--Kjeldjoh (diskussion) 20. mar 2018, 08:13 (CET)
Konklusion: |